Showing posts with label Transport. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transport. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 May 2015

More private Rides, more Ricebowls shattered

Photosource: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/transport/story/taxi-apps-singapore-20141217


Yesterday, a Bill had been passed to regulate third-party taxi booking apps. While Minister Lui addressed some minor concerns regarding the third-party apps, he neglected to address the more important concerns regarding private limousine services provider like Uber Executive, Uber X, GrabCar etc. This makes it rather apparent that the only point that Minister Lui brought across is that, all limousine providers like Uber and GrabCar are allowed to operate in Singapore!
 
Have the government stopped to consider the dire consequences of allowing them to operate in Singapore?

The Pioneer Government successfully wiped out the pirated taxi services in the 1960s and 1970s, only to have Minister Lui reverse the good work done by the Pioneers now!

Passengers have always been voicing their confusion about the local taxi fare. Now with the introduction of these private Limousines that set their own pricing, wouldn't it be more confusing to the passengers? For instance, Uber had their price surge when their limousines were in demand; the fare for a single trip could cost as high as $200. While Grabcar, with their complicated formula, charges different prices at different timing; this is not transparent to passengers at all. All these services are theoretically using metered charges, but they are easily tampered with so this casts doubts on the accuracy of the metered charges.

These days, any app provider is able to create meter apps on mobile phones, so does this mean that the government deems this to be legal?

Whenever someone witnesses a taxi getting involved in an accident, the first thinking would tend to be, “Taxi at fault again!”  Actually, with the constant watchful eyes of the public and in-car video recorders these days, most of the drivers will behave while driving on the roads. This cannot be said for those limousine drivers as the public does not know if they are transport service providers or private-owned cars.

While taxi drivers are worried that the “Feedback” given to LTA or their companies would result in them losing their rice bowls, it is unknown how these “Feedback” will improve the service standard of the drivers overall.

Due to stringent safety standards set by LTA to the taxi companies (for example, the taxi companies are not allowed to exceed the number of accidents per 10,000km travelled), the taxi companies are to comply with higher maintenance, while no rules are set for the Limousine operators.

Taxi vehicles are allowed to be used up to a maximum of 7 years with one year optional extension, upon which the taxis have to be scraped; whereas the limousine vehicles are allowed for use up to the end of the COE expiry date, and worst yet, the COE may be renewed to extend the life of the limousines!.

It is foreseen that a trend might emerge such that people buy their own vehicles under a company, using them to fetch passengers as and when they like without being subjected to any form of regulations at all.

This will in turn flood the industry with excess of transport providers, posing potential serious threat to the rice bowls of the full-time transport providers.

Taxi industry has been allocated to Singaporeans. With the introduction of the private transport providers, PRs are now allowed to drive, so the taxi industry is losing its original grounds of being an industry reserved for Singaporeans only.

Taxi fares are set by taxi companies; and any increase in fares need to be approved by PTC. Ironically, fare adjustments by private transport providers do not require seeking of the same approval, hence fares may be adjusted at the providers’ whim and fancy.
 
Certainly, a bad bill has been tabled and throngs of taxi drivers will soon be out of a job soon!

 

 

Yours sincerely,
William Lim

Constituency Secretary, SJP

Monday, 11 May 2015

Who bears the brunt of increased costs?


为了怕司机被挖角,私人巴士公司可能会提高司机的薪金来保留他们。这么一来,家长是否必须承担这些格外的开销呢?

把合约发给高投标者,使后者有条件以高薪挖角。为什么在解决公共交通品质问题的同时,却制造了另外一个问题给人民来承担。为什么政府不可以直接管理公共交通运作,而必需假手于人呢?




Due to fear of the drivers being poached away, private bus companies may raise salaries to keep their drivers. This way, do the parents have to bear the extra cost of it?

Contract is awarded to the highest bidder, hence the rest need to resort to poaching drivers with higher salaries. Why is it that the citizens have to shoulder the brunt when the government is resolving the issue of the quality of our public transport? Why can't the public transport be managed by government instead of private operators?








Wednesday, 6 May 2015

Trapped between Train Doors again

之前已经发生过同样的意外,为什么还是没有多大的改善?

难道不能改进现有的地铁车厢的门口加一片伸缩版吗?



 
There was a similar accident that occurred before, why aren't there more massive changes to improve the situation?

Why can't they improvise the current train cabins by adding another platform / board between the gaps?

Friday, 17 April 2015

Taxi is a Public Transport

这么多年来民众招德士都习惯在路边起手招德士。德士不停肯定会被搭客投诉。停车接客却使到他们频频接到非法停在路边的罚单。

德士明明是交通工具为什么不能像公共巴士那样,在每个巴士车站旁边设立德士车站呢?
 
 
 
 
There are so many people who are used to hailing taxis by the roadside. The cab drivers would get complained if they do not stop to pick these passengers up; yet when they stop for passengers they might get fined for stopping illegally.
 
Taxis are supposed to be public transport, therefore why can't they be like the buses - to situate a taxi stand next to every bus stop?