Monday 11 May 2015

Who bears the brunt of increased costs?


为了怕司机被挖角,私人巴士公司可能会提高司机的薪金来保留他们。这么一来,家长是否必须承担这些格外的开销呢?

把合约发给高投标者,使后者有条件以高薪挖角。为什么在解决公共交通品质问题的同时,却制造了另外一个问题给人民来承担。为什么政府不可以直接管理公共交通运作,而必需假手于人呢?




Due to fear of the drivers being poached away, private bus companies may raise salaries to keep their drivers. This way, do the parents have to bear the extra cost of it?

Contract is awarded to the highest bidder, hence the rest need to resort to poaching drivers with higher salaries. Why is it that the citizens have to shoulder the brunt when the government is resolving the issue of the quality of our public transport? Why can't the public transport be managed by government instead of private operators?








No comments:

Post a Comment